Friday, June 7, 2013

Serbs' Sufferings in Kosovo Continue

"After the destruction and desecration of Orthodox churches and monasteries, expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Serbs, human organ trafficking and similar crimes in Kosovo-Metohija, the Serbs are now being subjected to... barbarian destruction of gravestones, killings, attacks on properties and everyday threats."


Serbian Orthodox Assembly: Serbs’ suffering in Kosovo-Metohija continues
Maja Radojcic - Pravmir.com  

The Serbian Orthodox Church (SPC) Holy Assembly of Bishops announced on Tuesday that the suffering of Serbs in Kosovo-Metohija (KiM) continues, that the latest negotiating process in Brussels did not yield a solution for the problem, and that the SPC will continue to offer support to the Serbian government and parliament in preserving churches and monasteries and Serbia’s integrity in that province.

“The Assembly notes with regret that the international protectorate, presence of NATO forces in KiM and the latest top-level negotiations in Brussels did not bring about justice or a solution for the problem,” the Assembly said in a release after its regular session.

After the destruction and desecration of Orthodox churches and monasteries, expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Serbs, human organ trafficking and similar crimes in Kosovo-Metohija, the Serbs are now being subjected to a somewhat softer violence – barbarian destruction of gravestones, killings, attacks on properties and everyday threats.

In order to learn more about the efforts of the government and other state bodies, the Assembly asked First Deputy Prime Minister Aleksandar Vucic to visit the Assembly session, says the release.

During the visit, it was agreed that despite differences in approach to certain issues, there is unity and consensus when it comes to the commitment to the future of the Serb people in Kosovo, the preservation of churches and monasteries and the integrity of Serbia, which means a refusal to either directly or indirectly recognize the phantom statehood of Kosovo outside of Serbia, reads the release.

The Assembly assured Vucic that the government and parliament can count on the Church’s full support, within its competences and capabilities, reads the release.

Vucic attended the Assembly session on Friday.

The regular spring session of the Assembly of Bishops, the SPC legislative and judicial body, took place at the Patriarchate in Belgrade and Nis from May 21 to June 3.

Pope Francis I reiterates his recognition of the Armenian Genocide

In Vatican, Pope Francis Recognizes Armenian Genocide

BUENOS AIRES - AINA.org -- Pope Francis, during a meeting on June 3 with a delegation led by Nerses Bedros XIX, Catholicos Patriarch of Cilicia of the Armenian Catholics at the Vatican, reiterated his earlier recognition of the Armenian Genocide. 

During the visit, the pope met with members of the delegation, when one of them said that she was a descendant of genocide victims, to which the pontiff responded, "The first genocide of the 20th Century was that of the Armenians," thus reiterating his earlier recognition of the Armenian Genocide while he headed the Catholic Church in Buenos Aires as Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio.

Seven years ago, during events marking the 91st anniversary of the Armenian Genocide in Buenos Aires, he had urged Turkey to recognize the genocide as the "gravest crime of Ottoman Turkey against the Armenian people and the entire humanity."

The director of the Armenian National Committee of South America, Dr. Alfonso Tabakian, explained that this was the first such statement from the pontiff since being elevated to pope and leader of the Roman Catholic Church.

Tabakian called the statement "very important since his words transcend any state or religion."
"This recognition of the Armenian Genocide as the first genocide of the 20th century reaffirms the statements of John Paul II, [which were made] upon his arrival in Armenia on Sept. 25, 2001, demonstrating that more and more states, parliaments, and international organizations are adopting this position against the denial of history perpetrated by the Turkish state," added Tabakian.


During the visit, Nerses Bedros XIX presented the pope with a painting depicting Jesus Christ on the crucifix.

Turkey’s Christians Support the Protests against Erdogan

Amidst fears of what the future holds...


Turkey’s Christians Support the Protests
Burcin Gercek - Pravmir.com

Assyrians, Armenians, Greeks, or Latin Catholics, Christian minorities in the country share their Turkish compatriots’ anger.

“I do not think that the Christians’ future will be very bright in Turkey.” Yuhanna Aktas, founder of the Assyrian cultural association of Midyat, a city in the southeast of the country, thus shares his worry with regard to the policy of soft Islamization of the society carried out by the government under the AKP party. His association along with a dozen NGOs in Midyat have issued a communiqué in support of the protests, which have been been taking place for the past week in Turkey. The Assyrians (2500 people in Midyat and 18000 in Turkey) make up one of the principle Christian communities in the country, along with the Armenians (almost 70000 people) and the Greeks (2000 people).

Quran Courses Included in School Curricula

If the small city of Midyat has not seen protests, the Assyrians of other cities, notably Antakya and Diarbakr, have participated in what they are calling in Turkey “the Gezi Park Resistance”, after the name of the Istanbul park next to Taksim Square whose planned redevelopment provoked the people’s anger.

“We are seeing in our life the consequences of this government’s policy that excludes those who are not their own,” he states. “Courses on the Quran and the life of Muhammad have been included in school curricula. They are presented as an optional course. But in many schools, other optional courses are not opened under the pretext that there are not enough students. In small towns, Assyrian students are at risk of finding themselves forced to choose Quran courses.” Other problems of the Christian community, such as instruction in their native language or the right to own their monasteries, also remain unresolved.

Also the owner of a wine production facility, Yuhanna Aktas is also nervously following the recently passed resolutions restricting the sale of alcohol in Turkey. “The AKP is in the process of banning alcohol, but is doing so gently,” he believes. “First they banned online sales in 2011. The law that was just passed bans almost every kind of sale at a distance. We cannot even put wines in our window. They must be hidden in a space at the back of the store. They want to tell us gently ‘Close your business.’”

“Anger at a discourse that excludes”

Yuhanna Aktas nevertheless had voted for the AKP in 2002, when Recep Tayyip Erdogan was promising more freedom for all citizens. “There is a phrase that Erdogan often likes to use. ‘We are all brothers in this country: Turks, Kurds, Laz, Arabs, etc…’ But he never includes the Assyrians or the Armenians.” For the Christian entrepreneur, “the current protests reflect anger at a discourse that excludes.”

Members of the Assyrian community in Istanbul are also closely following the developing social movement. “We are not a homogenous community, so there are people who support and who distance themselves from these protests,” explains Rober Koptas, editor-in-chief of Agos, a newspaper published in Armenian and Turkish. “But I’ve seen many young Armenians who were present at the protests, but individually and in the name of their associations.”

“Rights of citizens”

For Rober Koptas, whose newspaper “supports the protests”, certain positive steps taken by the AKP, such as a restitution of part of the assets belonging to non-Muslim associations, do not make them “untouchable” in the eyes of the Christians. “We look at things from the perspective of the rights of citizens.”


As for the small Latin-rite Catholic community, which numbers 1500 faithful, they hope that the tensions can be calmed. The parish is situated close to Taksim, the central point for the protests. “We are the minority of minorities in Turkey,” says Mgr Louis-Armel Pelâtre, apostolic vicar of Istanbul. “The Latin-rite Catholics are not participating in the protests, but are following the events nervously.”

Report Details U.S. Government’s ‘Disastrous Muslim Outreach’


(CNSNews.com) - A new report documents the failures of Muslim outreach conducted by the U.S. government before and after the Sept. 11 attacks, faulting both Republican and Democrat administrations for reaching out to known terrorist funders and leaders.

Published by the Israel-based Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center by Patrick Poole, a counterterrorism consultant and investigative reporter, the 14,000-word exposé details the federal government’s “long-standing policy of engaging extremists.”

Among the many examples, Poole cites government leaders inviting radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki to the Pentagon, just months after one of his spiritual disciples had flown a plane into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.

The report, “Blind to Terror: The U.S. Government’s Disastrous Muslim Outreach Efforts and the Impact on U.S. Middle East Policy,” finds that a “campaign of political correctness”  has been ingrained in government, hindering investigations and resulting in culturally sensitive policies towards Islam, such as guidelines that required FBI agents to remove their shoes before raiding a mosque that financially supported the Taliban.

According to the report, President Obama issued a directive in August 2011 ordering law enforcement to engage “community partners” to help combat “violent extremism.”

“One example of the effect of this new policy are the Shari’a-compliant guidelines that federal law enforcement officials must now comply with when conducting raids related to Islamic leaders or institutions,” Poole explains.  “This was exhibited in May 2011, when the FBI raided a South Florida mosque and arrested its imam and his son for financially supporting the Taliban.”

The rules required law enforcement officials to remove their shoes before entering the mosque and dogs were barred from property, Poole said.  “The common sense of these new rules undoubtedly would have been put to the test had the subjects tried to flee, to be pursued by shoeless federal agents.”

The report also reveals that numerous leaders linked to terrorism have been used as conduits for the Muslim community since the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993, under the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations.

Poole points to Abdul Rahman al-Amoudi, who was a regular visitor to the White House under both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, who asked him to help train Muslim military chaplains.  He made six taxpayer-funded trips as a civilian goodwill ambassador to the Middle East for the State Department beginning in 1997.

But throughout his time working with the government, al-Amoudi was a major fundraiser for al-Qaeda.
Anwar al-Awlaki, the radical American-born Imam who was killed in Yemen by a drone strike authorized by Obama in 2011, was also a go-to community partner for the U.S. government.

“One of the first Muslim leaders that the government turned to was Anwar al-Awlaki,” says Poole, “the al-Qa’ida cleric who was in direct contact with at least three of the September 11 hijackers.”

“As the cleanup from the terrorist attack on the Pentagon continued, Awlaki was invited by the Pentagon’s Office of Government Counsel to speak at a lunch in the building’s executive offices as part of the government’s new Muslim outreach policy,” Poole writes.  “Ironically, one of the September 11 terrorists who had helped hijack American Airlines Flight 77 that was flown into the Pentagon had described Awlaki as ‘a great man’ and his ‘spiritual leader.’”

Awlaki had ties to terrorist suspects dating back to 1999, and continued to support terrorism, including email exchanges with Ft. Hood shooter Major Nidal Hasan.

In another example, Shaykh Kifah Mustapha, a long-time supporter of Hamas who was caught on video singing the terrorist group’s praises—“calling for violence against Jews as children danced around him carrying guns”—was given a guided tour of top-secret FBI facilities in 2010.

In November 2010, under Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s leadership, U.S. Ambassador to Britain Louis B. Susman visited the East London Mosque, a “longtime hotbed of extremism.”  The year before, the mosque hosted a conference where Awlaki phoned in.  Weeks before Susman’s visit, the mosque chairman said Awlaki’s involvement was an act of “fairness and justice.”

“The U.S. government…failed to even acknowledge the blunder, let alone attempt to reconsider its long-standing policy of engaging extremists,” he added.  “In fact, the American Embassy issued a statement explaining that the visit was ‘a part of President Obama’s call for a renewed dialogue with Muslim communities around the world.’”

As a result of that dialogue, several terrorists have been invited to the Obama White House, affecting U.S. foreign policy, Poole argues.

“In 2012, Hani Nour Eldin, a known member of the Egyptian al-Gama’a al-Islamiyya (a U.S.-designated terrorist group), was invited to Washington, D.C.” the report says.  “Eldin was escorted into the White House to meet with Obama’s national security staff.”  At the meeting Eldin demanded the release of the Blind Sheikh, currently in federal prison for masterminding the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

An “even more egregious” example is Nafie Ali Nafie, a Sudanese war criminal and architect of genocides in the Nuba Mountains and in Darfur, who was invited by the State Department to a Sudanese Delegation in May 2012.

“As these examples demonstrate,” Poole writes, “the U.S. government’s ignoring the terrorist support of its Muslim outreach partners has had a slippery-slope effect in its foreign policy by inviting members of terrorist groups and war criminals to Washington, D.C. for ‘dialogue.’”

“The legacy of the U.S. government’s Muslim outreach programs since the 1990s is a monument of failure by any measure,” Poole concludes.  “With more American lives and body parts strewn across American streets once again in Boston, these outreach partners threaten the health and legitimacy of our constitutional republic with their demands.


“It is clearly past time for Congress to ask whether this long since failed experiment should come to an immediate end.”

PRISM: Has Tyranny Triumphed in America?


The NY Times editorial board, after the revelation of the NSA's collection of phone data from millions of Verizon customers daily, slammed the Obama Administration as having "lost all credibility."

The NY Times' withering assault on Obama was apparently before the revelation that all the cellular and telecom companies were having to provide such data to the government, and it was certainly before this evening's screaming internet headlines about PRISM, the top-top-secret government internet server harvesting program implicating nine or more major internet companies including Microsoft, Google, Apple and AOL (many of whom are already denying that the government has direct access to their servers — much more to play out yet here).

According to the Washington Post article which broke the story, two senators whose clearance gave them classified knowledge of the system, were unable to speak of it openly:

Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Mark Udall (D-Colo.), who had classified knowledge of the program as members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, were unable to speak of it when they warned in a Dec. 27, 2012, floor debate that the FISA Amendments Act had what both of them called a “back-door search loophole” for the content of innocent Americans who were swept up in a search for someone else.
Is this not one of everyone's worst fears about our ever more intrusive, powerful, bullying and sinister government? The past several weeks have seen wave after wave of shocking scandals crash upon the generally accepting American public, to the point where we can glimpse the monster of tyranny behind the slipping mask of Uncle Sam.

  • Benghazi Cover-up
  • IRS intimidation of Conservative groups
  • AP phone records scandal
  • James Rosen of Fox News treated as a conspirator for doing his job as a reporter
  • Wiretapping of members of Congress - Holder refuses to deny
  • NSA harvesting data on billions of U.S. citizens' phone calls every day
  • PRISM: total surveillance of all Americans who are in any way on the grid

Even the author of the Patriot Act Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis, stated the NSA collection of phone data was never the intent of the law. But with the temptation of power in government, this is what happens. And the law will never be repealed, it will only be expanded as technology for surveillance improves. This is the future. This is our future.

Late last night, in an extraordinary statement, the Director of National Intelligence condemned the disclosure of data harvesting procedures, not the procedures themselves:

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper called the disclosure of an Internet surveillance program "reprehensible" and said it risks Americans' security... "The unauthorized disclosure of a top secret U.S. court document threatens potentially long-lasting and irreversible harm to our ability to identify and respond to the many threats facing our nation," Clapper said in an unusual late-night statement.
This is precisely the "newspeak" of a 1984-style, Orwellian totalitarian regime which is applying Soviet control principles to a pacified populace sedated and distracted by comforts, gadgets, and a sham pop culture that rots the brain.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Dr. Mark Durie: Salafis and the Muslim Brotherhood; What is the difference?

In his trademark dispassionate but no-nonsense, let the truth's own weight hit home, style, Dr. Mark Durie provides an essential article describing two of the dominant, mainstream movements within Islam today.

As we encounter these terms in news reports and articles, Dr. Durie's descriptions will help us focus on the essentials without preconceived notions or confusion.

Salafis and the Muslim Brotherhood: what is the difference?
Dr. Mark Durie - MarkDurie.com
06 Jun 2013

For western lay people, it can be hard to distinguish one radical Muslim from another.  What is the difference between Salafis and the Muslim Brotherhood?  Are they really all that different?  And why do Western governments seem to favour and even partner with Brotherhood-backed groups, but denigrate Salafis?

The 2011 People’s Assembly elections in Egypt focused the world’s attention on the Salafis when they proved to be the ‘dark horse’ of that poll, winning 25% of the seats.  This, together with the Muslim Brotherhood’s 47%, gave Islamists  almost three quarters of the seats in the Assembly. How do these two powerful Islamic groups compare?

Today the Brotherhood and Salafis also figure prominently in reports from Syria.  Both brands of Islamists field rebel forces in Syria, and Brotherhood leaders dominate the Syrian National Council, which has been recognized by the Arab League and some UN states as the legitimate representative of Syria.

Often the past Western politicians have made the mistake of dismissing the Salafis as marginal extremists, while being all too willing to lap up the Brotherhood’s propaganda about their democratic credentials.  A good example was David Cameron’s statement in Parliament this past week concerning the Syrian National Council, as he sought to downplay any suggestion  that the conflict in Syria had a religious basis:

“When I see the official Syrian opposition I do not see purely a religious grouping; I see a group of people who have declared that they are in favour of democracy, human rights and a future for minorities, including Christians, in Syria. That is the fact of the matter.”

As troubling as Cameron’s ignorance about Brotherhood ideology appears to be, even more disturbing is his intent to forward military support to rebel groups, at the very time that a report has come from Syrian refugees of genocidal measures being enacted by Islamist rebels against the Syrian Christian minority.

This past week evidence has also emerged that among the insurgents who attacked the American Embassy in Benghazi in September 2012 were Egyptians, captured on video saying that ‘Dr Morsi sent us’.  Yet Dr Morsi, the Brotherhood President of Egypt, is claimed by the US as an ally, and Brotherhood operatives have had long-standing high-level access to and support from the US Government.

Salafism

Salafism is a movement which emphasizes close adherence to the model of the Salaf or ‘predecessors’.  These were the first few generations of Muslims. To understand Salafism, one needs to grasp why the model of the Salafs is important to Muslims.

In normative Islam it is an article of faith that Muhammad is the ‘best example’ for other human beings to follow (Sura 33:21).  As a result a great many features of Islamic practice go back to what Muhammad did and said.  For example, conservative Muslim men grow beards precisely because Muhammad commanded this again and again: for example he stated that he would have nothing to do with men who shaved their beards; he gave specific instructions to men to let their beard grow; and he commanded his followers to be different from non-Muslims precisely in this, that they should not shave their beards.

The example and teaching of Muhammad — the Sunna — is an absolutely central and unassailably prestigious concept for mainstream Islamic faith and practice.

Knowledge about Muhammad’s example and teaching was, according to pious understanding, mediated to the world through Muhammad’s companions and the first few generations of Muslims.  The Salaf thus form the lens through which the example of Muhammad has been passed on to humanity.  

Muhammad himself said that ‘The best people are those of my generation, and then those who will come after them (the next generation), and then those who will come after them [the next generation after that]’ (Sahih Bukhari 76:437).  ‘Best’ implies the most rightly guided and most deserving to be emulated.

What all this means is that the Islam of the first generations of Muslims — the Salaf — is considered the purest and most prestigious form to follow. If a Muslim walks close to the Salaf in how they live, then they will be rightly guided and on the path to gaining Allah’s favour.

The Qur’an even declares a blessing in paradise for all those who follow the model of the first Muslims:

“The vanguard (of Islam) — the first of those who forsook (their homes) and of those who gave them aid, and (also) those who follow them in (all) good deeds, — well-pleased is Allah with them, as are they with Him: for them hath He prepared gardens under which rivers flow, to dwell therein for ever: that is the supreme felicity” (Sura 9:100).

Relying on such logic, the Salafi movement emphasizes the life of Muhammad, and the way of life of the first generations of Muslims.

Ominous: Obama Administration Seizes Millions of Phone Records on Daily Basis

The Obama Administration is the biggest supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Obama Administration is collecting phone records. The practice started under the Bush Administration during the height of the War on Terror. 

"It is not known whether Verizon is the only cell-phone provider to be targeted with such an order, although previous reporting has suggested the NSA has collected cell records from all major mobile networks."

Is this a test? Is the Administration preparing for something?

NSA collecting phone records of millions of Verizon customers daily

Exclusive: Top secret court order requiring Verizon to hand over all call data shows scale of domestic surveillance under Obama
Glenn Greenwald - UK Guardian - 5 June 2013

Read the Verizon court order in full here

The National Security Agency is currently collecting the telephone records of millions of US customers of Verizon, one of America's largest telecoms providers, under a top secret court order issued in April.

The order, a copy of which has been obtained by the Guardian, requires Verizon on an "ongoing, daily basis" to give the NSA information on all telephone calls in its systems, both within the US and between the US and other countries.

The document shows for the first time that under the Obama administration the communication records of millions of US citizens are being collected indiscriminately and in bulk – regardless of whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing.

The secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (Fisa) granted the order to the FBI on April 25, giving the government unlimited authority to obtain the data for a specified three-month period ending on July 19.

Under the terms of the blanket order, the numbers of both parties on a call are handed over, as is location data, call duration, unique identifiers, and the time and duration of all calls. The contents of the conversation itself are not covered.

The disclosure is likely to reignite longstanding debates in the US over the proper extent of the government's domestic spying powers.

Under the Bush administration, officials in security agencies had disclosed to reporters the large-scale collection of call records data by the NSA, but this is the first time significant and top-secret documents have revealed the continuation of the practice on a massive scale under President Obama.

The unlimited nature of the records being handed over to the NSA is extremely unusual. Fisa court orders typically direct the production of records pertaining to a specific named target who is suspected of being an agent of a terrorist group or foreign state, or a finite set of individually named targets.

The Guardian approached the National Security Agency, the White House and the Department of Justice for comment in advance of publication on Wednesday. All declined. The agencies were also offered the opportunity to raise specific security concerns regarding the publication of the court order.

The court order expressly bars Verizon from disclosing to the public either the existence of the FBI's request for its customers' records, or the court order itself.

Challenging Mosque Expansions - The Time is Now

Whenever I hear of a mosque proposal — whether new or expansion of an existing one — I call to mind this warning from Fr Daniel Byantoro, of the Indonesian Orthodox Mission, whose home country was taken over by Islam (emphasis added):
ROAD TO EMMAUS: On a community level, there are more and more Moslem immigrants in western Europe and in America, and naturally they want to build mosques, schools, etc. In your lectures you’ve been talking about the danger of the spread of Islam. Should local Christians just say, “No, we don’t want a mosque here.”?

FR. DANIEL: I think it should be up to the discretion of the local people. Although the Moslems wanting to build the mosque may be very peace-loving people, who knows what will come out of it later? 
RTE: Many Americans would say that preventing it is an infringement of their religious rights.

FR. DANIEL: That is because you have the idea of the separation of church and state, and that is alright, but in Islamic ideology the religion and state are one, and when the number of Moslems increase they may start looking for political power...
For an excellent article exploring how one British lawyer has successfully stopped 16 of the 17 mosque construction cases he has represented, go here. Gavin Boby "uses the law to stop the building of mosques in the UK by demonstrating to local councils that the building of a mosque or an Islamic centre is actually in violation of British law."

As a reminder to anyone who is not already familiar with these statistics, four separate studies over the last ten years have consistently documented that upwards of 80% of mosques in the U.S. preach violent jihad and Islamic supremacism. These studies also address foreign funding of mosques by Saudi Arabia and other exporters of extremism. If you wish to examine the source documents, here they are:


A recent article by Ryan Mauro of The Clarion Project documents Muslim Brotherhood links to mosque initiatives in Oklahoma and Alabama. Mauro writes:
1991 U.S. Muslim Brotherhood memo identifies ISNA and NAIT as one of “our organizations and the organizations of our friends.” The memo says its “work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within.” Federal prosecutors designated both as unindicted co-conspirators in the trial of the Holy Land Foundation for financing Hamas. The two were listed as U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entities.
This article by Mauro is so important, I have posted it below the break. Please read it all. Stopping these mosque initiatives by Islamic supremacist organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood and its subsidiary entities in the U.S. will require savvy legal intervention along the lines of what Gavin Boby is doing in England. Time to study up and get informed.

Continue to read the article by Ryan Mauro on Muslim Brotherhood mosques in the U.S...

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Female Muslim Convert from Michigan who died in Syria fighting for Jihadists

This tragic story (scroll down for the Reuters report) raises questions about what prompts people to convert to Islam, especially Christians, and especially young Christian women.

It hits somewhat close to home, as several years ago a young woman from my parish committed apostasy and converted to Islam. Though she seemed to convert through marriage, she had long held affinities for Islam through her experiences with Muslim friends in college. After converting, she soon fully embraced wearing the hijab, and was sharing her new found faith through local news op eds and interviews, as well as staying in regular touch with some of my friends in the parish, presumably to witness her new faith to them. My friends and I lost touch with her after several years, so presumably she is still in the "moderate" Muslim camp, though last we knew, she and her husband were living in a city with a large mosque with an extremist imam and radical ties.

One can understand to some extent the counter-cultural attraction Islam may have for a young woman of modest manner, who sees the hijab as a desirable thing. Yet the irony is that in the Orthodox Church, a woman can also wear a head covering, and is encouraged to practice not only outward modesty, but inward holiness, being given exalted models of womanhood to emulate, from the Virgin Mary herself, to the Myrrhbearing Women, to the heroic martyrs Catherine and Barbara, St Macrina the Elder, grandmother to three saints of the Church, St Mary of Egypt, and many, many others.

In our own day, here in America, it often seems women monastics are setting the most consistent example for the monastic life, such as at Holy Transfiguration in Ellwood City and the Dormition of the Mother of God Monastery in Michigan.

Similarly, in parish life, women are every bit the pillars as the men, perhaps even more so based on my experiences, teaching church school, organizing charitable drives, welcoming visitors, serving on parish council, organizing retreats, helping form and disciple young women converts and couples, singing in the choir, leading youth camp retreats, etc.

There is simply no reason for a young woman to reject this vibrant, living tradition of sanctity, holiness, virtue, and above all, devotion to Jesus Christ, the Blessed Trinity, and the Orthodox Church. Thus cases like the young woman from my parish are clear-cut examples of spiritual delusion of some kind or another.

In her case, she came from a Quaker upbringing, with the general principle to "embrace truth wherever you find it." This syncretistic philosophy is the heretical obverse of St Justin's teaching of the "Seeds of the Logos" planted in all peoples and faith traditions, whereby a Christian can discern the points which will resonate for their non-Christian friends and acquaintances, from which she/he may begin to witness to them the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Sadly, this notion eluded this young woman, who bought into the Muslim claim that Islam properly venerates Jesus, and that Islam and Christianity are fully compatible. She seemed unable to understand or accept our priest's warning to her that if she married a Muslim man she would be excommunicating herself from the Church and denying Jesus Christ, committing outright apostasy. Thank God for his clear, true and loving pastoral counsel, yet she completely rejected his words, and is now in serious spiritual danger, though we hope and pray for her to repent and return to Christ.

Other counter-jihad writers have felt prompted by the tale of this Michigan woman to ask why yet another convert to Islam felt compelled to wage jihad, and why no mainstream Muslim organizations in the U.S. offer any solutions or programs to teach Muslims to reject the jihadist teachings. Of course, as we know, the Quran and all of Islam's source texts and all its schools of jurisprudence command offensive jihad as obligatory upon all Muslims. If they cannot fight, they are called upon to support the jihad, hence the continuous prosecutions of terrorist funding cases in the U.S. and elsewhere.

But here, we must reflect on the loss of a poor, deceived soul, who thought she was finding life, and is instead in the grave here, and God alone knows the condition of her soul after death.

The frightful tragedy of the Michigan woman who was killed fighting on behalf of jihadists in Syria is yet another shocking reminder of the pervasive spiritual blindness of our time, and of the powerful delusions unleashed upon our age.
_________

Female convert to Islam from Michigan dies in Syria fighting for the jihadists.

A 33-year-old Michigan woman and convert to Islam has been killed in Syria while fighting with opposition forces against the government of President Bashar Assad in the country's civil war, her family said on Thursday.

The woman's aunt told Reuters that the FBI had informed her on Thursday afternoon of the death of her niece, Nicole Mansfield of Flint, but said she did not have the details of how she died.

"I'm just devastated," said the aunt, Monica Mansfield Speelman. "Evidently, she was fighting with opposition forces."

Speelman said Mansfield, a single mother of an 18-year-old daughter, had converted to Islam about five years ago but that she did not know when her niece had traveled to Syria.

"I didn't think she would stoop that low to go over there and try to harm anybody," Speelman said of her niece, who she said had worked at a group home....

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Pure, 7th Century Islam Returns to Syria

Dr. Mark Durie relates what is really going on in Syria, via eyewitness accounts. These are horrifying stories, which speak of a paralyzing fear and an unspeakable dread about the future.


The Dhimma Returns to Syria

The following report comes from Martin Janssen in Amman, Jordan (original in Dutch). The preceding notes and translation from Dutch into English are by Dr. Mark Durie, an Anglican vicar in Melbourne, Australia, author of The Third Choice, and an Associate Fellow at the Middle Eastern Forum.

In his report Janssen tells of his experience of a prayer walk in Amman, held on May 21 2013 for the two abducted Syrian clergy, Greek Orthodox Archbishop Paul Yazigi and Syriac Orthodox Archbishop Yohanna Ibrahim.  These Archbishops have been captured by Syrian rebels. 

After the prayer walk Janssen had the opportunity to meet with Syrian Christian refugees, who told him how they came to flee their homes and villages.  Their village was occupied by rebel forces, who proceeded to announce that they were now under an Islamic emirate, and were subject to sharia law. 

The Christian residents were offered four choices:  

1. renounce the ‘idolatry’ of Christianity and convert to Islam;
2. pay a heavy tribute to the Muslims for the privilege of keeping their heads and their Christian faith (this tribute is known as jizya);
3. be killed;
4. flee for their lives, leaving all their belongings behind. 

Some Christians were killed, some fled, some tried to pay the jizya and found it too heavy a burden to bear after the rebels kept increasing the amount they had to pay,  and some were unable to flee or pay, so they converted to Islam to save themselves.

The scenario reported by Syrian refugees is a re-enactment of the historic fate of Christians across the Middle East.  The Muslim historian Al-Tabari reported that when the Caliph ‘Umar conquered Syria, he gave the following command to his armies:

“Summon the [conquered] people to Allah; those who respond unto your call, accept it [their conversion to Islam] from them, but those who refuse must pay the jizya out of humiliation and lowliness. If they refuse this, it is the sword without leniency.”

Umar's command referenced Sura (chapter) 9 verse 29 of the Koran:

“Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the jizya readily, being brought low.”

This policy of subjugating Christians under the yoke of jizya taxation was also based upon the teaching of Muhammad who said:

“Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah.
Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war …
When you meet your enemies who are polytheists,
invite them to three courses of action.
if they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold
yourself from doing them any harm.
Invite them to (accept) Islam;
if they respond to you, accept it from them
and desist from fighting against them ….
If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the jizya.
If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands.
If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.”
(Sahih Muslim. The Book of Jihad and Expedition. [Kitab al-Jihad wa’l-Siyar])
Classical Islamic law mandates that ‘People of the Book’ should be given three choices, however the Syrian rebels are augmenting this with the fourth option of allowing them to flee.  

In Islamic law, Christians who accept to pay the jizya in order to keep their faith – and their head – are known as dhimmis.For a full explanation of the Islamic doctrine of the three choices, including the psychological meaning of the jizya tribute, see The Third Choice especially Chapter 6: The Dhimma: Doctrine and History).

It is a matter of deep concern that European states and the US are assisting the Syrian rebels as they implement this Islamic ‘emirate’, which includes the restoration of the dhimma system by re-enacting the conditions of jihad conquest against Christians.
___________

A conversation with Syrian refugees in Amman
by Martin Janssen

Last Tuesday, May 21 a prayer walk was held in the Jordanian capital Amman around nightfall.  Its purpose was to inquire after the unknown fate of the two Syrian bishops who were kidnapped over a month ago.  I had agreed with some members of the congregation where I always worship to take part and traveled there with them. During the journey I was brought into contact with a Syrian priest from Aleppo who after the journey was concluded introduced me to a group of Syrian Christian refugees. The priest suggested that we all spend the rest of the evening together so that as a correspondent from Europe I could listen to the stories and testimonies of these Syrians.

Syrian refugees of all religious backgrounds – not just Christians – do not feel at ease in neighboring countries such as Lebanon and Jordan. They get the very strong impression that they are not welcome and that the open hostility of the local population towards them is growing. In Jordan, for example, some parliamentarians have been calling on the government for months to expell all Syrian refugees from the country because they pose a security risk. The problem is that this accusation contains an kernel of truth. Our evening discussion group of 12 people included some Jordanian Christians. They reported that a few weeks early the Jordanian security services had managed to thwart an assassination attempt on Abdullah, the Jordanian monarch. This attack was planned and orchestrated by a sleeper cell of the Syrian, al-Qaida affiliated, Jabhat al-Nusra movement. It was precisely to escape such radical Islamic movements that Syrian Christians have fled to Jordan.

My interlocutors this evening were almost all from northern Syria. They came from Idlib, Aleppo and villages in the countryside between the two cities. Their testimony was unanimous. Many of these villages had a large Christian presence until a few years ago, but now Christians no longer lived there. Jamil, an elderly man, told the following story during which other attendees began to nod violently in agreement. They appeared to have experienced exactly the same things.

Jamil lived in a village near Idlib where 30 Christian families had always lived peacefully alongside some 200 Sunni families. That changed dramatically in the summer of 2012. One Friday trucks appeared in the village with heavily armed and bearded strangers who did not know anyone in the village. They began to drive through the village with a loud speaker broadcasting the message that their village was now part of an Islamic emirate and Muslim women were henceforth to dress in accordance with the provisions of the Islamic Sharia. Christians were given four choices. They could convert to Islam and renounce their “idolatry”. If they refused they were allowed to remain on condition that they pay the jizya. This is a special tax that non-Muslims under Islamic law must pay for “protection”. For Christians who refused there remained two choices: they could leave behind all their property or they would be slain. The word that was used for the latter in Arabic (dhabaha) refers to the ritual slaughter of sacrificial animals [MD: i.e. by cutting the throat].

After Jamil had finished his story a gloomy silence descended. I asked him how the 30 Christian families in his village had perished since then. He replied that a number of families – including his own family – had initially opted to pay jizya. When the leader of the armed militia in their village, however, noticed that they were able to do this, the amount kept increasing in the following months. Like almost all other Christian families he eventually fled the village. His land and farm were lost. Some Christian families in his village who were unable to escape or pay the jizya converted to Islam. To his knowledge, there were no Christians killed in his village, but he had heard other stories from a neighboring village where only three Christian families survived. They were all murdered in the middle of the night.

Miryam, an Armenian middle-aged woman from Aleppo, made the biggest impression on me. A common thread running through all the stories from different places in northern Syria during this evening was the constant complaint that armed militias looted and plundered. From wheat, bread and diesel in the villages to the complete inventory of schools, businesses and factories in Aleppo. Factory owners who protested were executed without mercy. Miryam said acquaintances who fled to Turkey learned that members of these armed militias were selling this “war booty” at bargain basement prices in Turkey. Miryam looked at me thoughtfully and said something which remained constantly with me over the following days. She told me that she had learned last year that a human being has a tremendous ability to adapt to the most difficult conditions. They had to learn to live in Aleppo without water or food, and sometimes no electricity for days on end. They even had to learn to live with the sounds of explosives and gunfire that tore them from sleep at night.

However, what a man cannot live with is the constant terror that paralyzes him completely:  the daily fear that the bus transporting children to their school would be targeted by a suicide attack; the psychological fear that comes over you on Sunday when you go to church knowing there are groups active in your neighborhood who consider it a religious duty to kill as many Christians as possible; and finally the situation that at night you do not dare to go to bed because you have received reports about acquaintances and relatives who were surprised by a rocket that crashed out of nowhere onto their property while they slept; or what can happen when you spend hours in a long line at one of the few bakeries that still make bread. Indeed Miryam told me that she never could have imagined that even the simplest of life’s activities had suddenly become dangerous.

At the end of the night I struggled inwardly with a question that I did not dare to express but which I finally found the courage to utter. What next? What did these Syrian refugees have to say about their own future and that of Christianity in Syria? Later I realized that in fact no one answered this question. The Armenian Miryam said she was thinking of emigrating with her family to Armenia, while Jamil talked about relatives who lived in Sweden.  Perhaps their answer to my question lay hidden in these comments.


Just after midnight I drove home with the members of my church from Amman. Everyone was silent and seemed lost in thought. I was to be dropped off at the church. This church sits on a hill which was once almost always enchantingly lit, but I had  noticed recently that this was no longer the case. While getting out of the car I asked about the reason and was told that “there were people who had taken offense”. I also saw three young men quasi-nonchalantly keeping watch at the church.  When I asked if this was necessary, the short reply I got was “Yes.”