by Joe Herring and Dr. Mark Christian
For those of you unfamiliar with Islamic history, Umar bin al-Khattab – the second Islamic Caliph – made an agreement with the subjugated Christians of Syria setting forth the conditions under which said Christians would be permitted to live in proximity to the conquering Muslims.
This
Pact of Umar is the origination of the concept of
dhimmitude, a dehumanizing status belonging to subjugated non-Muslims in Islamist societies.
The translation I have re-produced below comes from the stellar book by Raymond Ibrahim, titled
Crucified Again.
In return for their lives, the Christians agreed:
- Not to build a church in our city—nor a monastery, convent, or monk’s cell in the surrounding areas—and not to repair those that fall in ruins or are in Muslim quarters;
- Not to clang our cymbals except lightly and from the innermost recesses of our churches;
- Not to display a cross on them [churches], nor raise our voices during prayer or readings in our churches anywhere near Muslims;
- Not to produce a cross or [Christian] book in the markets of the Muslims;
- Not to congregate in the open for Easter or Palm Sunday, nor lift our voices [in lamentation] for our dead nor show our firelights with them near the market places of the Muslims;
- Not to display any signs of polytheism, nor make our religion appealing, nor call or proselytize anyone to it;
- Not to prevent any of our relatives who wish to enter into Islam;
- Not to possess or bear any arms whatsoever, nor gird ourselves with swords;
- To honor the Muslims, show them the way, and rise up from our seats if they wish to sit down;
Adhere to these conditions and live. Break these conditions and all bets are off. While this pact was made in the early 7th Century, it is still considered relevant today as evidenced by its widespread application throughout the Middle East.
The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) certainly considers these conditions to be quite pertinent to the present-day conduct of interfaith relations. They are enforcing the conditions on the Christian residents of Syria, in addition to the regions they have recently conquered in Iraq.
According to the
BBC, ISIS offers a heck of a deal – you must convert to Islam or if you remain Christian, you must accept
dhimmi status and pay the
jizya, (a tax for non-Muslims only) or… you can just be put to the sword.
As wildly enticing as the first or third choices may appear, most opt for door number two and live out their lives as second-class subjects. This is the hard-tyranny of Islamic supremacy. The inherently political and social nature of Islam and Sharia leave no room for other forms of intersection between believers and unbelievers.
This hard-tyranny is the hallmark of the Caliphate system. Freedom is an unknown concept; liberty is blasphemy in a system that crushes the individual into mortar paste for the building of greater Islam.
The global left views the advent of a new Caliphate as something akin to an Islamic version of the European Union, an economic and political alliance designed to trade with the rest of the world on an equal footing. Nothing could be further from the truth.
The Caliphate is a means toward an end; that end being Islamic dominance. The Caliphate is merely the structural entity that will administer Sharia throughout an Islamist-controlled world.
Considering the recent proliferation of “interfaith” initiatives throughout Western Europe and the United States, it seems prudent to give more than a cursory glance to the preferred ground-rules of the Islamists, and to examine the role such interfaith efforts might play in an expanding the Caliphate system.
One such interfaith initiative, here in Omaha, Nebraska intends to co-locate a Mosque, a Synagogue and a Church on the same campus.
There is a
“Memorandum of Understanding” (MOA) that governs the interaction between the three faiths that make up the
Tri-Faith Initiative, as they call themselves. It lays the ground rules for everything from site planning, to building design and subsequent use.