In fact, they never killed him, they never crucified him — they were made to think that they did. All factions who are disputing in this matter are full of doubt concerning this issue. They possess no knowledge; they only conjecture. For certain, they never killed him. (Sura 4:157)
This patently false assertion in the supposedly divine Koran goes against not only the Gospel accounts, but even the historical witness of first century Roman and Jewish historians, as I note in my book, Facing Islam (p. 57):
...From a purely secular standpoint alone, Jesus the Christ is written of by numerous Roman and Jewish historians from the mid first-century onwards, including Thallus (who wrote circa 52 AD about Jesus’ crucifixion and the darkness over the land), Mara Bar-Serapion (writing ca. 70 AD), the renowned Jewish historian Josephus (ca. 93 AD), the Roman historian Tacitus (ca. 110-120 AD), and others. As Orthodox Christians, we of course rely primarily on the integrity of the Apostolic witness, the Gospels, the Acts of the Apostles, the Epistles and the Holy Tradition of the Church for our knowledge and understanding of the life, ministry and Person of Jesus Christ.
For an excellent study of the validity of the Gospel accounts, I strongly recommend 'Jesus and the Eyewitnesses - The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony', by Richard Bauckham. In the meantime, I hope you enjoy and share the below article as we journey with the Lord to His cross and resurrection.
Jesus' Words Backed by Archaeology: The Stones Are Crying Out
by Charles Colson, Charisma News via Pravoslavie
February 7, 2015
A few years ago, people exploring caves outside Jerusalem came across the find of a lifetime: an ancient burial cave containing the remains of a crucified man. This find is only one in a series of finds that overturns a century-old scholarly consensus.
That consensus held that the Gospels are almost entirely proclamation and contain little, if any, real history. The remains belonged to a man who had been executed in the first century A.D., that is, from the time of Jesus.
As Jeffrey Sheler writes in his book Is the Bible True? the skeleton confirms what the evangelists wrote about Jesus' death and burial in several important ways.
First, location—scholars had long doubted the biblical account of Jesus' burial. They believed that crucified criminals were tossed in a mass grave and then devoured by wild animals. But this man, a near contemporary of Jesus, was buried in the same way the Bible says Jesus was buried.
Then there's the physical evidence from the skeleton. The man's shinbones appeared to have been broken. This confirms what John wrote about the practice of Roman executioners. They would break the legs of the crucified to hasten death, something from which Jesus, already dead, was spared.
