Showing posts with label traditional values. Show all posts
Showing posts with label traditional values. Show all posts

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Patrick J. Buchanan: Whose Side Is God on Now?

"In the culture war for the future of mankind, Putin is planting Russia's flag firmly on the side of traditional Christianity."

by Patrick J. Buchanan, Creators.com — April 3, 2014

In his Kremlin defense of Russia's annexation of Crimea, Vladimir Putin, even before he began listing the battles where Russian blood had been shed on Crimean soil, spoke of an older deeper bond.

Crimea, said Putin, "is the location of ancient Khersones, where Prince Vladimir was baptized. His spiritual feat of adopting Orthodoxy predetermined the overall basis of the culture, civilization and human values that unite the peoples of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus."

Russia is a Christian country, Putin was saying.

This speech recalls last December's address where the former KGB chief spoke of Russia as standing against a decadent West:

Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values. Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan. This is the path to degradation.

Heard any Western leader, say, Barack Obama, talk like that lately?

Indicting the "Bolsheviks" who gave away Crimea to Ukraine, Putin declared, "May God judge them."

What is going on here?

With Marxism-Leninism a dead faith, Putin is saying the new ideological struggle is between a debauched West led by the United States and a traditionalist world Russia would be proud to lead.

In the new war of beliefs, Putin is saying, it is Russia that is on God's side. The West is Gomorrah.

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Western model of society is becoming increasingly marginal – Russian Orthodox Church

“Certain representatives of Western civilization... and the Islamic civilization strive to global domination through force."

Interfax via Pravmir — 1/7/2014

Moscow, January 7, Interfax – The Western model of society cannot cope with modern challenges, head of the Synodal Department for Church and Society Relations Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin has said.

“To my mind, Western civilization still cannot realize that its model of social order is shared by the minority of people in the world and is typical of only that civilization, and it is typical mainly of peaceful times and becomes increasingly marginal being unable to cope with threatening challenges of history,” he said in an interview with the website of the Russian Academy of Economy and Public Service with the president.

He said that certain representatives of Western civilization are trying to impose their choice by force but many nations gradually learn to resist that. He did not rule out that the 21st century will be marked “by a successful search for possibilities of military deterrence of the United States.”

“Certain representatives of the Islamic civilization also strive to global domination through force. We see evidence of that throughout the world. At times they act no less cunningly than the Western ‘hawks’ trying to use force or strong propaganda or promises depending on the circumstances,” Father Vsevolod said.

Georgian Patriarch asks Europe not to impose alien ideas on nation

Just as in Russia, Greece, Serbia and other Orthodox countries, the Church faces increasing demands and pressures from militant secularists, democrats and homosexuals on one side, and militant Islam on the other. We live in an age of extremists, where healthy and true, traditional Christianity is pinned in a vise grip between competing totalitarian ideologies. This calls for the patient endurance and faith of the saints!

AXIOS to Patriarch Ilia for boldly rebuking the pressures from Europe in his Nativity Message.


Georgian Patriarch asks Europe not to impose alien ideas on nation
Interfax via Pravmir — 1/7/2014

Tbilisi, January 7, Interfax – Patriarch Ilia II of All Georgia has urged the European Union to take into account Georgia’s determination to adhere to it traditional values.



“The European Union should take into account our traditional views and not impose the ideals of same-sex “marriages” and same-sex “families” that are alien to us here,” his Christmas message circulated in St. Trinity Cathedral in Tbilisi last night says.

Friday, December 13, 2013

Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin advises Orthodox countries not to adopt Western democracy models

At first glance, this article seems not about Islam and Orthodoxy proper. However, it does perhaps offer one explanation as to why Russia has been able to maintain a firm check on Islamic supremacism within her borders. Unlike the U.S., U.K., and other Western nations, Russia does not shy away from naming, confronting and dealing with threats to her people, culture and national security. Witness the rounding up of 300 jihadis last year, or the banning of a translation of the Koran due to its extremist nature. 


Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin advises Orthodox countries not to adopt Western democracy models
Interfax via Pravmir — 11/29/2013

Moscow, November 29, Interfax – The Moscow Patriarchate has called on Orthodox countries, including Russia, not to change in dialogue with the European Union under its influence, but suggest that the EU change instead.

“Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Greece, Serbia, and Bulgaria – representatives of the most powerful civilization – could well demand that the Western members of the Council of Europe begin forming a renewed organization from scratch, changing a lot of what is characteristic of the Western part of Europe and is not characteristic of its eastern part, when entering the Council of Europe, Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin, the head of the Synodal Department for Church and Society Relations, said in an article published on the Interfax-Religion website.

Likewise, any negotiations with the EU should now begin “with a question as to how the EU is ready to change to be able to become a common house not only for the western, but also for the eastern socio-political tradition on a parity basis, not with docile hearing of someone’s instructions,” he said.

“The western democracy model is now used by a minority of the population of our planet, and it should eventually be realized as an indication that this model is not the only model and that insisting on its universality, especially that all peoples and all legal and political systems should adjust to it is, to put it mildly, unfair and unjust,” Father Vsevolod said.

Friday, November 1, 2013

VIDEO: Putin on Cultural Self-Preservation

A follow up to my piece on Forbes naming Russian President Vladimir Putin, 'World's Most Powerful Person'. Putin could be speaking directly to Obama in this lecture. h/t Ray.




Why Putin is ‘Most Powerful’

by Ralph H. Sidway


Forbes has named Russian President Vladimir Putin the World’s Most Powerful Person 2013, taking U.S President Barack Hussein Obama down a peg. 

In her presentation of the list, Forbes correspondent Caroline Howard writes,

Putin has solidified his control over Russia while Obama’s lame duck period has seemingly set in earlier than usual for a two-term president — latest example: the government shutdown mess. Anyone watching this year’s chess match over Syria and NSA leaks has a clear idea of the shifting individual power dynamics.

The Independent likewise noted Putin’s “power dynamics,” while drawing attention to Obama’s wobbly statesmanship, as well as UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s vacillations: 

According to the World's Most Powerful People 2013 list compiled by Forbes, recent weak displays on the international stage - from inaction on Syria to the Government shutdown - have seen the US president knocked off the top spot he held last year. 
Putin's strengthening control in Russia, meanwhile, has resulted in what Forbes described as a clear "shifting of individual power dynamics"... 
Britain managed just one person in the list, with Prime Minister David Cameron dropping from number 10 last year to eleventh place today. Forbes criticised Mr Cameron for a recent "flip-flop approach to green taxes", though credited him with "guiding the world's sixth largest economy".

However, neither Forbes, nor the Independent, nor ABC, nor any of the other news sources I checked for this story mention Putin's firm repudiation of Islamic extremism as a factor in his standing. Yet it is precisely Putin’s famous scolding of Obama and UK Prime Minister David Cameron back in June for their insipid support of cannibalistic jihadists in Syria, and his equally strong rejection of Western military intervention in Syria during his toe-to-toe with Obama at the G20 meeting in St Petersburg, Russia which stand out among this year’s most dramatic tête-à-têtes on the international stage. 

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Metropolitan Hilarion: the unique role of the Russian Orthodox Church is that it unites the peoples of the post-Soviet space

Many insights in this wide-ranging interview...

PRAVMIR — 10/22/2013


On October 19, 2013, Metropolitan Hilarion as the host of the Church and the World talk show on Vesti-24 TV channel had as his guest Fedor Lukyanov, journalist and political scientist, chairman of the Council for Foreign and Defence Policy. Below is the abridged text of their talk.

Fedor Lukyanov: We are meeting at a very interesting moment. Not so long ago there was the Valdai Forum which attracted truly universal attention throughout the world. The theme of the Forum was Russia’s Identity in the Rapidly Changing World, which is of primary importance both for our country and the whole world. You were a guest of the Forum and made a very interesting speech. Can you tell us about your expression? Did you feel anything new in that atmosphere?

Metropolitan Hilarion:  First, it seemed to me that the whole atmosphere of the Forum was very much in harmony with the spirit of our time. It was an atmosphere of frank discussion between people concerned, between those who sometimes find themselves at the opposite ends of the pubic spectre expressing polar points of view while being able to speak with each other. It suggests that we have made a certain progress, at least in the area of conducting debates.

Certainly, I was very much impressed by the President’s speech. I should say that I don’t remember of any programmatic speech made in recent time that would give so much attention to things we as church people hold dear, to spiritual and moral values. We often hear from state leaders statements about the economic or financial policy, but when, after a long interval, we heard something about moral and spiritual values, about the importance of inter-confessional dialogue, about the importance of the Russian Orthodox Church and the role of the clergy in people’s life and special calling of Russia as guardian of these values, I took it as the most important of all that was said at the forum. I think it will play an important role in policy both in Russia and on the international arena.

F.L. I agree, it was an extraordinary speech. I as a person involved in international relations noticed the statement in the speech that competition in the new changing world will become more acute, but along with traditional spheres, such as military and political, it moves to another plane. In the first place, it is the problem of moral values. Secondly, the president emphasized that there will be the struggle for man, for ensuring conditions for his development. It will become a guarantee for the development of the state.

M. H. The fact that the state is increasingly turning to the real man can be considered a very important and very positive shift in our social development. But the real man is not a mere economic or financial element. The life of the real man is based on particular spiritual and moral values.

It is interesting that the President spoke on the theme that we often discuss speaking about the processes taking place in the West. Indeed, a systemic destruction of family values is happening there today.

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Solzhenitsyn's 1978 Harvard Address: VIDEO and TEXT

Here is the original broadcast video, with English translation, and the complete text to follow along. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn was a prophetic voice, and nowhere is that more evident than in this rightly famous address. Fr Seraphim Rose focused on many of Solzhenitsyn's observations, of course from an Orthodox Christian viewpoint, therefore they may be considered together.

I assure you, you will be stunned at what he says about the loss of courage in the West, about the Press, about every aspect of his analysis.

If you have the means to watch this on a large screen TV (through an AppleTV or other set-top box with YouTube), I would urge you to make it an event for your family and friends, or for your parish. Pop some popcorn, hand out notepads, even pause every so often to discuss some radical point or another. This is not a past event for us to venerate, but a call to prayer, to repentance, to action, and to witness (martyria).



A World Split Apart
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's 1978 Harvard Commencement Address
PRAVMIR — Posted June 8, 2013

Thirty-five years ago today – on June 8, 1978 – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, who had arrived in the United States three years earlier, delivered the commencement address at Harvard University. The “Harvard Address,” as it has popularly come to be known, is most likely Solzhenitsyn’s most famous work of non-fiction. Famous, that is, but little read. On its thirty-fifth anniversary, we offer this prophetic work for our readers’ reconsideration.


I am sincerely happy to be here with you on this occasion and to become personally acquainted with this old and most prestigious University. My congratulations and very best wishes to all of today’s graduates.

Harvard’s motto is “Veritas.” Many of you have already found out and others will find out in the course of their lives that truth eludes us if we do not concentrate with total attention on its pursuit. And even while it eludes us, the illusion still lingers of knowing it and leads to many misunderstandings. Also, truth is seldom pleasant; it is almost invariably bitter. There is some bitterness in my speech today, too. But I want to stress that it comes not from an adversary but from a friend.

Three years ago in the United States I said certain things which at that time appeared unacceptable. Today, however, many people agree with what I then said…

The split in today’s world is perceptible even to a hasty glance. Any of our contemporaries readily identifies two world powers, each of them already capable of entirely destroying the other. However, understanding of the split often is limited to this political conception, to the illusion that danger may be abolished through successful diplomatic negotiations or by achieving a balance of armed forces. The truth is that the split is a much profounder and a more alienating one, that the rifts are more than one can see at first glance. This deep manifold split bears the danger of manifold disaster for all of us, in accordance with the ancient truth that a Kingdom – in this case, our Earth – divided against itself cannot stand.

Monday, September 2, 2013

Patriarch Kyrill of Moscow: West trying to 'reformat' Russia

Interfax — 8/31/2013 — h/t Fr A

SMOLENSK, Russia. Aug 31 (Interfax) - The head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill, insisted on Saturday that Russia defend its values against alleged Western attempts to make the country scrap them.

"Not formal sovereignty but real sovereignty - the ability to defend one's point of view in the international arena even if it doesn't coincide with the opinion of the most powerful of countries," Kirill said at a meeting with students in Smolensk, where he is on a pastoral visit.

"Today there are many people in the world who are annoyed by our sovereignty," he said, citing one foreign politicians as saying, "To achieve peace throughout the world, we must reformat you."

"In other words, shape us to their liking," the patriarch said. He insisted on the use of what he argued are traditional Russian moral principles as the basis for upbringing Russian children.

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Syria, the Pope, China: A Conversation with Orthodox Metropolitan Hilarion

AsiaNews via Pravmir — 8/31/2013

Moscow (AsiaNews) - The concern for the fate of Christians in Syria , where ” extremist forces aim to completely destroy Christianity “, the signs of a possible “normalization of worship for Orthodox believers in China ” ; dissatisfaction in the field of theological dialogue with Catholics, but the “amazing results ” in the common work on moral and the social values . In an interview with AsiaNews , Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk , Head of the Moscow Patriarchate’s Department for External Relations, tackles the main “foreign policy” themes of the Russian Orthodox Church and also focuses on the internal situation in Russia, where – he says – the much- criticized law against homosexual propaganda should be taken as a model by Western countries , which instead by favouring homosexual unions are heading towards “certain death .”

The situation is dramatic is Syria, what is the Russian Orthodox Churches’ view of this conflict ?

The situation in Syria deeply troubles us. This armed conflict has been going on for some time now. I would not term it a civil war, because I believe that it is a case of a struggle between diverse states in the territory of a third State, and very often the armed groups , which some call the opposition , are actually composed of foreigners, fighting with foreign money.

What concerns the Moscow Patriarchate most?

What worries the Russian Orthodox Church most of all is the fate of the civilian population and that of the Christians. It is clear that the extremist forces seeking power have set themselves the goal of the complete and total destruction of Christianity in Syria. And if they take power, even temporarily, the Christian population will be eliminated or driven out from their lands and their churches will be destroyed. 

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Pat Buchanan: Post vs. Putin — Whose Side Are You On?


This is yet another welcome article from Patrick J. Buchanan, holding up for admiration the resurgent Russia, who is striving to hold Christian ideals and morality aloft for all the world to follow. You'd almost think Mr. Buchanan has read some of my recent articles on Russia:

Russia now towers above the increasingly decadent and evil West, led by Obama and Cameron, who support cannibalistic Syrian rebels and Muslim extremists, enable genocide against Christians throughout the Islamic world, enable infanticide in America through "4th trimester" abortions and the HHS mandate, demand nations accept the militant homosexual agenda, and dare to condemn the world's strongest, most luminous Christian nation.

Whoever supports Obama is supporting the agenda of Antichrist. Choose your side wisely.

POST V. PUTIN — WHOSE SIDE ARE YOU ON?
SOURCE: Human Events via Pravoslavie.ru
By: Patrick J. Buchanan


The culture war has gone global.

And the divisions are not only between, but within nations.

“Suddenly, homosexuality is against the law,” wailed Jay Leno. “I mean, this seems like Germany. Let’s round up the Jews. Let’s round up the gays. … I mean, it starts like that.”

Leno was speaking of Vladimir Putin’s Russia. Obama eagerly agreed:

“I have no patience for countries that treat gays or lesbians … in ways that intimidate them or are harmful to them. … Nobody is more offended than me by some of the antigay and lesbian legislation that you’ve been seeing in Russia.”

Leno and Obama were referring to a new Russian law prohibiting “homosexual propaganda.” Moscow is also warning foreigners, including visitors to the winter Olympics in Sochi, that propagandizing for gay rights can get them two weeks in detention. No kiss-ins allowed.

“Medieval,” howled The Washington Post. “Mr. Putin’s war” on gays and lesbians is “part and parcel of his lapse into xenophobia, religious chauvinism and general intolerance.”

Monday’s New York Times has a front-page story — “Gays in Russia Find No Haven, Despite Support From the West” — featuring photos of roughed-up protesters.

Our moral and cultural elites have put Putin on notice: Get in step with us on homosexual rights — or we may just boycott your Sochi games.

What this reveals is the distance America has traveled, morally and culturally, in a few short years, and our amnesia about who we Americans once were, and what it is we once believed.

Friday, July 5, 2013

What Can We Do to Fight for Traditional Values?

Fr. John Whiteford has another excellent entry in his "Stump the Priest" Q&A series. Orthodox readers will be especially interested in this one.  Fr. John supplied the photo, which shows an Orthodox saint engaging in battle with an invading Muslim Tatar (see caption)...  Do read all the way to the end.   AXIOS Fr. John!!!


Stump the Priest:
What Can We Do to Fight for Traditional Values?

 St. Alexander Peresvet in single combat with the Tatar champion Chelubey 
at the opening of the Battle of Kulikovo (8 September 1380).

Question: What are the ways (either derived from doctrine, history, or as guided by current leadership) that ordinary members of the Church--those who need to go to work everyday and may not have a whole lot of extra time to devote--contribute in trying to influence our culture to affirm traditional values and "push back" against those forces that are trying to destroy them?

Answer: There are a number of different levels on which we have to push back:

1). The most important thing for us to do is to begin with ourselves, and to make sure that we are living a pious Christian life, in accordance with the Orthodox Tradition. If we do so, we will influence those around us, and what we say and do otherwise to defend traditional values will carry weight, whereas if we speak out about these values, but do not live them ourselves, everything else we say and do will be a waste of time.

2). Going one step further, we must make sure that our homes reflect traditional Orthodox Christian values. Aside from working on ourselves, ensuring that our children will grow up to be devote Orthodox Christians is the greatest work we can accomplish.

3).We should also work within our parish to make sure that there is one more welcoming spiritual haven for those seeking salvation. A parish has many things that need to be done, and not everyone can do them all, but everyone can do something. We should ask God to show us what our part is, and take it as seriously as we would our secular jobs… in fact we should take it more seriously.

4). Beyond that, there are a number of things that we can do impact those outside of our parishes: