Dreher: 'Britain: Rape Gangs & A Conquered Nation'

Kudos to Rod Dreher for his unflinching writing on the ruling elites of Great Britain and Western European countries in general, as they surrender to Muslim immigrants while exerting totalitarian control over their native populations. In Dreher's words:

"To me, there is no more vivid sign of a conquered nation’s mentality than the UK’s rape gang scandal."

 

The British government shuts down free speech and enacts literal thought crime laws, arresting citizens for praying in public and posting memes online, while they enable the abduction, drugging, rape and forced sexual slavery of thousands of young native English girls by Pakistani (i.e., Muslim) gangs.

From Dreher's June 17 Substack (This might be behind a paywall. At only $5 a month, it's well worth it, and he is writing and commenting on a wide range of pertinent topics often ignored or given distorted coverage by the MSM.)

Dinner last night with a British friend in town for a few days. Very gloomy man. Doesn’t think the UK and Europe will “make it” — though funnily enough, I didn’t ask him to define what he meant. Did he mean avoid civil war? Maintain their traditional population? Avoid going Muslim? All of it?

It doesn’t really matter. Whenever Brits or Euros talk like that these days, it is enough to know that they are talking about civilizational despair. To me, there is no more vivid sign of a conquered nation’s mentality than the UK’s rape gang scandal. Imagine a country whose leadership and police elites allowed young native girls to be raped, drugged, and pressed into sexual slavery by immigrant men, who do so explicitly because of the race of these girls (and perhaps because these girls do not share the religion of their rapists). Imagine that they allowed it because they did not want to be thought of as bigots.

It happened in Britain. And somehow, the British people do not take to the streets demanding the resignation and prosecution of every one of these cops, politicians, and elites who covered it up. 

Has there ever been a nation or a people that would sit meekly as foreign men came to their country, systematically raped and drugged their female children, and did so precisely because these kids were white and not Muslim?

There is now.

This is a devastating indictment of a formerly great Western Christian Power. Now the UK is a de facto dhimmi state which dares not stand against its triumphant Muslim invaders. 

More (links in original):

Keep in mind that the rape gang story is not new. It has been known about at least since a 2012 Parliamentary inquiry.

Two years ago, GB News documentarian Charlie Peters produced this stunning 45-minute report on the horrific scandal. More recently, Elon Musk last year made a big deal about it on X, which revived anger. The Labour government has tried very, very hard to suppress public interest in it, but the pressure finally became too great. A new official report by Baroness Louise Casey is now leading to calls for a full national inquiry.

Dreher draws particular attention to the shocking descriptions of the trauma suffered by the young victims at the hands of their Muslim torturers: 

Today, Telegraph columnist Suzanne Moore writes:

“ 'Unrapeable'  is the word that always sticks in my mind. A policeman more than 15 years ago described one of the victims of the grooming gangs this way. This unrapeable thing, dehumanised and up for unspeakable violation, was actually a 13-year-old child with blood running down between her legs. The word 'child' matters here because there has been a fundamental refusal to see the girls trafficked around the country and abused by countless men in countless ways, as actual children."

Ever predictable, the Labour Party, just like Democrats in the United States and leftist goverments in Europe, tries to paint anyone who draws attention to their crimes as "far right." More citations from Dreher: 

Telegraph columnist Nick Timothy, a Tory MP, says the Labour government has tried to dismiss legitimate concerns about violence, religion, and ethnicity by calling anyone who notices it “far right”. More:

"But the most notorious example of the far right smear has been the Government’s dismissal of concerns about the rape gangs of mainly Pakistani, Muslim men who systematically abused vulnerable, white working class girls. When the Conservatives pressed for a national inquiry earlier this year, Starmer accused the Party of “spreading lies and misinformation” and “amplifying what the far-Right is saying.” In an attempt to avoid an inquiry, Starmer commissioned Louise Casey to conduct an “audit” of the crimes and their investigation. But Casey concluded an inquiry was necessary and Starmer has folded."

There is much more in Dreher's full post, but these two tweets which he shares help illustrate the seriousness of the government's crimes against its citizenry. The first calls it "the biggest scandal in British history":

This next one, Dreher introduces as follows:

The historian Tom Holland, in a tweet yesterday, touched the third rail:

This is where those in the West who are new to considering the obscene violence of sexual crimes committed by Muslim immigrants are at a loss for how to proceed in their writing about the problem. They don't really know from what angle to approach Islam to find "sources" for these horrific and aggressive practices, and will be tempted to deny it and exonerate Islam. Even Holland seems to opt for using ISIS as a source, as they, being a contemporary fundamentalist branch of Islam, clearly were trying to hold true to the commands of Allah and the example of Muhammad.

Thankfully we can turn to Raymond Ibrahim and other knowledgeable Islam scholars like him who have been warning and writing about these issues for many years now. 

From a 2020 article on Raymond's website, where he discusses ISIS and the Islamic teachings on keeping and raping sex slaves from among the non-believers, i.e., non-Muslims:

Is the sexual enslavement of non-Muslim women an Islamic State idea or merely an Islamic idea?

First, lest there is any doubt that ISIS members were not only convinced that it was their Islamic right to sexually enslave “infidels,” but that doing so was pious, consider this account from 2015: “In the moments before he raped the 12-year-old [non-Muslim] girl, the Islamic State fighter took the time to explain that what he was about to do was not a sin. Because the preteen girl practiced a religion other than Islam, the Quran not only gave him the right to rape her — it condoned and encouraged it, he insisted.”  “He said that by raping me,” recalled the 12-year-old, “he is drawing closer to God.”

“Every time that he came to rape me, he would pray,” explained another girl, aged 15. “He said that raping me is his prayer to God. I said to him, ‘What you’re doing to me is wrong, and it will not bring you closer to God.’ And he said, ‘No, it’s allowed. It’s halal.’”

Such claims are of course consistent with a Q&A pamphlet on the topic published by the Islamic State in 2015:

• Question 1: What is al-sabi?

• Al-Sabi is a woman from among ahl al-harb [the “people of war,” meaning un-subjugated non-Muslims] who has been captured by Muslims.

• Question 2: What makes al-sabi permissible?

• What makes al-sabi permissible [i.e., what makes it permissible to take such a woman captive] is [her] unbelief. Unbelieving [women] who were captured and brought into the abode of Islam are permissible to us, after the imam distributes them [among us].

• Question 3: Can all unbelieving women be taken captive?

• There is no dispute among the scholars that it is permissible to capture unbelieving women [who are characterized by] original unbelief [kufr asli], such as the kitabiyat [women from among the People of the Book, i.e., Jews and Christians] and polytheists. However, [the scholars] are disputed over [the issue of] capturing apostate women. The consensus leans toward forbidding it, though some people of knowledge think it permissible. We [ISIS] lean toward accepting the consensus….

• Question 4: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female captive?

• It is permissible to have sexual intercourse with the female captive. Allah the almighty said: “[Successful are the believers] who guard their chastity, except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, for then they are free from blame [Koran 23:5–6].”…

• Question 5: Is it permissible to have intercourse with a female captive immediately after taking possession [of her]?

• If she is a virgin, he [her master] can have intercourse with her immediately after taking possession of her. However, if she isn’t, her uterus must be purified [first]….

More:

An important question arises at this juncture: Are these beliefs based on ISIS’s own interpretation of Islam—as we are repeatedly told by the “experts”—or are they based on standard Islamic teachings?

Evidence clearly indicates the latter.  Most recently, for instance, on February 2, 2020,  Reuters reported that “The man shot dead by police after wounding two people in a stabbing spree on a busy London street… described Yazidi women as slaves and said the Koran made it permissible to rape them.”  A few weeks earlier, in late December, African migrants in Paris “repeatedly cited Allah, the Koran, and Mecca,” while raping a minor girl in Paris (original).  One can go on and on; consider just the following quotes limited to the ongoing sex grooming scandals in the UK:

“Muslim abusers quoted Qur’an as they beat me,” said one of countless rape victims.

“The men who did this to me have no remorse,” said another victim of her Muslim rapists. “They would tell me that what they were doing was OK in their culture.”

A Muslim convicted of rape confessed that sharing non-Muslim girls for sex was “a religious requirement.” 

None of these men were ISIS members; they were just Muslims.  If they shared the same outlook concerning the sexual bondage of non-Muslim women, that is because Islam—not the Islamic State, a byproduct—promotes it.

Read much more in the full article. And don't let the British, German, or American media or authorities deceive you with their lies that Islam does not teach such things. Kudos to Tom Holland for daring to bring it up, and likewise to Rod Dreher for giving it a larger audience on his highly trafficked Substack.

Closing word to Raymond Ibrahm from his 2020 article:

From here it becomes clear why so many Muslim men—above and beyond ISIS card-carrying members—see and treat “infidel” women in Europe and elsewhere as “pieces of meat”. As the all-important answer to the third question in the ISIS pamphlet correctly states: “There is no dispute among the scholars that it is permissible to capture unbelieving women [who are characterized by] original unbelief [kufr asli, meaning they were born as non-Muslims], such as the kitabiyat [women from among the People of the Book, i.e., Jews and Christians] and polytheists.”

Such is the impact of the Islamic “sacrament” captured in Koran (4:3; 23: 5-6, etc.): all non-Muslim women—be they atheists, Christians, Jews, polytheists, wiccans et al—are free game for abducting and enslaving. They exist, quite simply, for the “pleasure of Muslim men,” as a would-be rapist once told a reluctant Christian girl before murdering her.