In light of the purported use of chemical weapons in Syria, months after Obama drew a red line on the same issue, the world is left with nothing but rhetoric regarding who actually used them. As we’ve noted before, it would not be the first time Muslims bombed their own people to initiate U.S. intervention.
(Read our previous post, Canadian military intelligence: Muslims in Bosnia shelled their own people.)
THE HAGUE – The Canadian military intelligence officer has testified today at the trial of Radovan Karadzic before the ICTY, said that BiH. Muslims artillery firing at their own people in Sarajevo in order to blame the Serbs and to provoke international intervention against them.
He pointed out that, according to the information he had, the Muslims were responsible for “at least one” of the two explosions at Markale.
In the first, fifth February 1994, killing 66 people and injuring more than 140 people. In the second, 28 August 1995, 43 people were killed, and the wounded 75.
It also fits the timeline of Bill Clinton’s offer, via The “Srebrenica Massacre” as a Western Myth:
Dorin also reminded of the statements by the Muslim politicians given to media about an “offer” American president Bill Clinton made to Bosnian Muslim war leader Alija Izetbegović back in April 1993, to have “the Chetnik [Serb] forces enter Srebrenica and massacre 5,000 Muslims, which would result in the [US-led NATO] military intervention” against Bosnian Serbs.
At the same time, Dutch UNPROFOR troops testified that Serb Army treated Muslim civilians in an entirely correct manner, while Srebrenica Muslim warlord Naser Orić with his fighters was massacring Serb civilians in the most monstrous fashion for years in Srebrenica municipality, and pillaging and destroying their property all the while.
All this while Clinton OK’d Iran-Bosnia Arms Sales.
Los Angeles Times | Friday, April 5, 1996
WASHINGTON – President Clinton secretly gave a green light to covert Iranian arms shipments into Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1994 despite a United Nations arms embargo that the United States was pledged to uphold, according to senior administration officials and other sources.
Two top U.S. diplomats, acting on instructions from the White House and the State Department, told Croatian President Franjo Tudjman in early 1994 that the United States would not object to the creation of an arms pipeline that would channel the weapons through Croatia and into Bosnia for the Muslim forces fighting in the bloody civil war.
More from a prominent researcher who is close to the UN via Peace researcher: Common to provoke NATO interventions by false flags.
STOCKHOLM – From 9th to 11th August a conference entitled ”Nordic peace talks” was held in the Swedish city of Degerfors. The event was attended by several organizations and peace activists from Sweden, Norway and Denmark. One of the attending organizations was Justitia Pax Veritas, a non profit organization headquartered in Stockholm, dealing with issues related to the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia.
During the three-day conference there were a number of lectures related to, among other things, the creeping possibility of a Swedish NATO membership, the current propaganda about the war in Syria, the legitimization of US and NATO military intervetions by the doctrine of R2P (Responsibility to Protect).
At the meeting of Nordic peace activists one of the speakers was professor Ola Tunander from Peace Research Institute Oslo. During the lecture ”After Libya – Syria and the permanent members of the UN Security Council”, Tunander compared the propaganda in Libya and Syria to that of the war in the former Yugoslav republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The Norwegian professor with close ties to NATO spoke about the shelling of Sarajevo Markale market, for which the Bosnian Serbs were blamed and the Bosnian Serb general Stanislav Galic convicted by the Hague tribunal. The professor told of multiple sources – a representative of the Crisis Staff of NATO, the Chairman of the Military Committee of NATO Vigleik Eide and subsequent Norwegian ministers of defense and foreign affairs – who had announced the conclusion of a NATO investigation according to which "the Bosnian side", as he called forces under the control of Alija Izetbegovic, were responsible for the incident.
They all said that NATO’s conclusion was that it was a Bosnian attack on their own population. But this was never announced publicly. And it looks like it is common, eg., before decisions of the United Nations, to performe so-called ”false flag operations”, ie fraud attacks against the own population, in order to legitimize military interventions, said Tunander.
Video of his speech on Youtube if anyone can translate (VladTepes?).
Obama is funding and covertly arming the Syrian rebels and by publicly announcing his so-called red line Obama may have given cover to Syrian rebels to use chemical weapons to force UN or US intervention to overthrow Assad.
Such actions would not be unprecedented.